It can be a terrifying moment. When a notice arrives saying the federal government intends to start garnishing a paycheck or Social Security check, keep in mind many people are in this situation and there are options for help.
Every year, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and agencies like the Small Business Administration (SBA) move thousands of delinquent debts, including defaulted COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL), into collection programs. They can use tools like Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG), the Treasury Offset Program (TOP), and can even bring in private-sector collection agencies.
But people have rights. Federal law requires the government to warn taxpayers first, to explain the debt, and to give people a chance to respond. Generally, this step is supposed to be in a written letter sent to the debtor’s last known address with the government well in advance of any actions being taken. However, government agencies routinely make mistakes in this process that borrowers can use to halt garnishment. Here's what's happening when the government garnishes pay or benefits, what rights people have, and ways to deal with this.
Frost Law is working extensively on COVID-19 EIDL issues. There’s been increasing activity in this area in recent months after the SBA sent about 500,000 of these delinquent pandemic loans into the Treasury collection system. To help borrowers understand what they face, Frost Law has written a series of articles covering the loan program. Explore the rest of the series here:
Under the law, the federal government has two separate legal tools for collecting delinquent nontax debt, like a defaulted SBA loan, an overpayment, or another debt owed to a federal agency. In both situations, no lawsuit needs to be filed.
Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) lets a federal agency order an employer to withhold money directly from a paycheck and pay it to the federal government for amounts that are owed. This authority comes from the Debt Collection Improvement Act and is spelled out in detail at 31 CFR 285.11. It applies to wages earned from an employer, not to Social Security.
The Treasury Offset Program (TOP), run out of the U.S. Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, works differently. TOP intercepts federal payments for debts. These include payments like tax refunds, federal salary, and, importantly, Social Security retirement, survivor, and disability benefits. The process redirects a portion of these payments to offset the debt.
Many delinquent debts, including charged-off COVID-19 EIDLs from SBA, eventually move into Treasury's Cross-Servicing program, which is authorized to use both AWG and TOP. To recover what’s owed, tools can include demand letters, credit bureau reporting, referrals to private collection agencies, and referrals to the Department of Justice for litigation.
Before either tool can be used to collect on a delinquent government debt, the law requires the agency to warn people in writing. The required notice periods differ depending on which tool is used.
For those blindsided by a garnishment, with no earlier letter, phone call, or attempt to verify an address, that's worth flagging immediately. The person’s due process rights may not have been upheld by the governmental agency. Agencies are required to keep evidence of when and how these notices were mailed, and a missing or defective notice is one of the more common grounds for challenging a garnishment or collection action under TOP.
Under federal law – specifically 31 CFR 285.11 — once the 30-day AWG notice is received, people have the right to:
To preserve the strongest protections, a written hearing request generally needs to be submitted within 15 business days of the notice being mailed. Do not ignore this or delay acting. Request it in time, and the agency cannot issue a wage withholding order until a hearing is held and a decision is made. Miss that window, and the agency can move forward with garnishment while the hearing is still pending, even though a hearing is still available.
At the hearing, the agency has the burden of proving the debt exists and is accurate. For those disputing it, they need to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that no debt exists, the amount is wrong, or that collection would work an undue hardship.
Both tools are capped; the government cannot take everything.
If a garnishment already in place is pushing someone into real financial hardship because of changes like disability, divorce, or serious illness, they can ask the agency at any time to review and reduce the amount based on the current ability to pay.
Agencies don't always follow their own rules, and a federal watchdog recently documented exactly how. A 2025 audit by the SBA's Office of Inspector General found that when borrowers defaulted on COVID-19 EIDLs, the SBA often relied on automated calls and demand letters, then abandoned collateral and charged off loans, sometimes the very same day it had contact with the borrower, without confirming what assets or repayment options actually existed. The audit also found the SBA failed to report the vast majority of delinquent borrowers to credit bureaus and never referred debts to the Department of Justice for litigation, despite requirements to do so.
Why does this matter for borrowers? Because the law and policy are clear. Debt collection cannot be based on rushed automation. It cannot be based on shortcuts where due process rights are not upheld. And rushed collections or shortcuts often result in missteps ranging from in the wrong balance being owed, a notice being sent to the wrong address or other missteps in the required process. And for debts that were already settled or discharged in bankruptcy, it could lead to them being collected once again. Any of these can be grounds to dispute a garnishment and get it paused until the dispute is resolved. The burden is on the government to prove the debt, not on borrowers to disprove it.
Garnishment notices come with real, short deadlines, and missing one can mean money leaves your paycheck or Social Security check before you ever get a hearing. For those who have received a notice — or money is already being withheld – time is critical. The sooner Frost Law reviews your file, the more options are still on the table. Remember, every day of delay brings the hearing deadline closer.
Schedule a consultation with Frost Law or call (410) 497-5947 now to protect your paycheck or benefits before it's too late.

It can be a terrifying moment. When a notice arrives saying the federal government intends to start garnishing a paycheck or Social Security check, keep in mind many people are in this situation and there are options for help.
Every year, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and agencies like the Small Business Administration (SBA) move thousands of delinquent debts, including defaulted COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL), into collection programs. They can use tools like Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG), the Treasury Offset Program (TOP), and can even bring in private-sector collection agencies.
But people have rights. Federal law requires the government to warn taxpayers first, to explain the debt, and to give people a chance to respond. Generally, this step is supposed to be in a written letter sent to the debtor’s last known address with the government well in advance of any actions being taken. However, government agencies routinely make mistakes in this process that borrowers can use to halt garnishment. Here's what's happening when the government garnishes pay or benefits, what rights people have, and ways to deal with this.
Frost Law is working extensively on COVID-19 EIDL issues. There’s been increasing activity in this area in recent months after the SBA sent about 500,000 of these delinquent pandemic loans into the Treasury collection system. To help borrowers understand what they face, Frost Law has written a series of articles covering the loan program. Explore the rest of the series here:
Under the law, the federal government has two separate legal tools for collecting delinquent nontax debt, like a defaulted SBA loan, an overpayment, or another debt owed to a federal agency. In both situations, no lawsuit needs to be filed.
Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG) lets a federal agency order an employer to withhold money directly from a paycheck and pay it to the federal government for amounts that are owed. This authority comes from the Debt Collection Improvement Act and is spelled out in detail at 31 CFR 285.11. It applies to wages earned from an employer, not to Social Security.
The Treasury Offset Program (TOP), run out of the U.S. Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, works differently. TOP intercepts federal payments for debts. These include payments like tax refunds, federal salary, and, importantly, Social Security retirement, survivor, and disability benefits. The process redirects a portion of these payments to offset the debt.
Many delinquent debts, including charged-off COVID-19 EIDLs from SBA, eventually move into Treasury's Cross-Servicing program, which is authorized to use both AWG and TOP. To recover what’s owed, tools can include demand letters, credit bureau reporting, referrals to private collection agencies, and referrals to the Department of Justice for litigation.
Before either tool can be used to collect on a delinquent government debt, the law requires the agency to warn people in writing. The required notice periods differ depending on which tool is used.
For those blindsided by a garnishment, with no earlier letter, phone call, or attempt to verify an address, that's worth flagging immediately. The person’s due process rights may not have been upheld by the governmental agency. Agencies are required to keep evidence of when and how these notices were mailed, and a missing or defective notice is one of the more common grounds for challenging a garnishment or collection action under TOP.
Under federal law – specifically 31 CFR 285.11 — once the 30-day AWG notice is received, people have the right to:
To preserve the strongest protections, a written hearing request generally needs to be submitted within 15 business days of the notice being mailed. Do not ignore this or delay acting. Request it in time, and the agency cannot issue a wage withholding order until a hearing is held and a decision is made. Miss that window, and the agency can move forward with garnishment while the hearing is still pending, even though a hearing is still available.
At the hearing, the agency has the burden of proving the debt exists and is accurate. For those disputing it, they need to show, by a preponderance of the evidence, that no debt exists, the amount is wrong, or that collection would work an undue hardship.
Both tools are capped; the government cannot take everything.
If a garnishment already in place is pushing someone into real financial hardship because of changes like disability, divorce, or serious illness, they can ask the agency at any time to review and reduce the amount based on the current ability to pay.
Agencies don't always follow their own rules, and a federal watchdog recently documented exactly how. A 2025 audit by the SBA's Office of Inspector General found that when borrowers defaulted on COVID-19 EIDLs, the SBA often relied on automated calls and demand letters, then abandoned collateral and charged off loans, sometimes the very same day it had contact with the borrower, without confirming what assets or repayment options actually existed. The audit also found the SBA failed to report the vast majority of delinquent borrowers to credit bureaus and never referred debts to the Department of Justice for litigation, despite requirements to do so.
Why does this matter for borrowers? Because the law and policy are clear. Debt collection cannot be based on rushed automation. It cannot be based on shortcuts where due process rights are not upheld. And rushed collections or shortcuts often result in missteps ranging from in the wrong balance being owed, a notice being sent to the wrong address or other missteps in the required process. And for debts that were already settled or discharged in bankruptcy, it could lead to them being collected once again. Any of these can be grounds to dispute a garnishment and get it paused until the dispute is resolved. The burden is on the government to prove the debt, not on borrowers to disprove it.
Garnishment notices come with real, short deadlines, and missing one can mean money leaves your paycheck or Social Security check before you ever get a hearing. For those who have received a notice — or money is already being withheld – time is critical. The sooner Frost Law reviews your file, the more options are still on the table. Remember, every day of delay brings the hearing deadline closer.
Schedule a consultation with Frost Law or call (410) 497-5947 now to protect your paycheck or benefits before it's too late.