Businesses with SBA EIDL loans shouldn’t be fooled by this maneuver

When a business is buried in debt, there’s a tempting idea for struggling owners. They start a new company, move the equipment, customer accounts, and money over to it, and leave the old company—and its bills—behind.

There’s a big catch: This idea almost never works. Courts in nearly every state can undo the transfer, make the new company pay the old company’s debts. And, in some cases, the courts go after the owners personally.

This is a particularly important cautionary tale for businesses struggling with delinquent Economic Injury Disaster Loans, or EIDL, given during the pandemic by the Small Business Administration. Some 500,000 of these delinquent loans have been sent over to the Treasury Department’s collection area, which is causing businesses to look for options given the financial stress. Businesses struggling with an EIDL delinquency or need help with a bankruptcy situation can reach out to the team at Frost Law. Call (410) 497-5947 or schedule a free consultation.

For businesses considering moving assets, here is how courts look at these moves, and what separates a legitimate sale from one that will backfire.

Have Questions? Call us for Your consultation.

The Starting Point: Buying Assets Usually Does Not Mean Buying Debts

In most states, a company that buys another business’s assets does not automatically become responsible for that business’s debts. The rule makes sense. It lets a struggling company sell what it owns, and it lets the buyer pay a fair price without worrying about bills or lawsuits it does not know about.

But this is only the starting point. Courts follow the rule when the sale is a real deal between independent parties, each looking out for its own interests. When the sale looks like a trick to get away from creditors, the courts set the rule aside. Courts usually rely on two provisions—or tools—to do it—fraudulent transfer law and successor liability.

Tool #1: Fraudulent Transfer Law

Almost every state has a law that lets creditors undo transfers meant to cheat them. Most states use a version of a model law called the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, or its older version, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. The idea behind these laws is centuries old: You cannot give away or hide property to keep it out of your creditors’ reach.

In this scenario, a creditor can win in one of two ways:

  • Proving the business meant to dodge creditors. The creditor shows the business moved assets to block, delay, or cheat someone it owed money to, now or in the future. Few owners admit to this, so courts look at the surrounding facts for warning signs, which lawyers call “badges of fraud.”
  • Showing the deal was unfair, even with no bad intent. A transfer can be undone if the business got much less than the assets were worth and, at the time, it could not pay its debts or was left without enough money to keep operating.

Common warning signs about these transfers include:

  • The assets went to an insider—an owner, officer, or family member—or to a company with the same owners.
  • The business got little or nothing in return.
  • The transfer happened soon after the business missed payments, was threatened with a lawsuit, or was sued.
  • The business or its owners kept using or controlling the assets after the “sale.”
  • The transfer left the business unable to pay its debts or stripped of its main assets.
  • The sale was kept secret.

If a court finds such a fraudulent transfer, it can cancel the transfer, let the creditor go after the assets in the new owner’s hands, and in some cases order whoever received the assets to pay the creditor directly.

Tool #2: Successor Liability—When the New Company Is Treated as the Old One

Successor liability works differently. Instead of undoing one specific transfer, it makes the new company responsible for the old company’s debts. The rules vary from state to state, but courts generally do this in four situations:

  • The new company is just the old one with a new name. Courts look for the same owners and managers, the same kind of business, the same location, employees, and customers, and a failure to pay fair value for the assets. Courts call this a “mere continuation.”
  • The deal is really a merger. The paperwork may call it an asset sale, but if the two businesses actually combined, a court can treat it as a merger, and the debts come along with it.
  • The sale was designed to escape debts. If the point of the sale was to move assets away from the old company’s creditors, the new company can be held responsible.
  • The buyer agreed to take on the debts. This can happen in the contract itself or through the buyer’s actions, such as paying the old company’s bills.

In practice, the more the new business looks and runs like the old one, the bigger the risk.

Keeping the same name, signs, letterhead, and staff all make the new company look like the old one with a new label. In many states, a key question is whether the same people own and run both companies. Some courts have also said that a creditor does not need to prove an intent to cheat under the “mere continuation” rule. That means a transfer can fail this test even if it would hold up against a fraudulent transfer claim.

Can the Owners Be Personally Liable?

Going after the new company is one thing. Going after the owners personally is another—but creditors have several ways to do it:

  • Suing the people involved. Owners or managers who received assets, or who arranged the transfer, can be named in a fraudulent transfer lawsuit. When a transfer was clearly meant to cheat creditors, the owners may have to pay personally. And, in some cases, they may also have to cover the creditor’s legal costs.
  • “Piercing the corporate veil.” An LLC or corporation normally shields its owners’ personal assets. But if the owners treated the company as an extension of themselves —mixing personal and business money, ignoring basic company formalities, or never putting enough money into the business—a court may disregard the company and hold the owners personally responsible.
  • Bankruptcy. If the old company files for bankruptcy, or its creditors force it into bankruptcy, a bankruptcy trustee can usually challenge transfers made before the filing, including some made years earlier.

Where Is the Line? What to Do and What Not to Do

Restructuring a business is not illegal. Companies sell parts of their business, reorganize for tax or practical reasons, and buy assets from struggling businesses all the time. The question is how the deal is done.

A transfer is much more likely to hold up when:

  • The price is fair market value, backed up by financial statements, an appraisal, or a competitive sale process such as an auction.
  • The buyer is unrelated, and the seller and its owners keep no ownership or control after the sale.
  • The seller can still pay its debts and is not under pressure from a lawsuit or a threatened lawsuit.
  • The deal is openly documented, not hidden.

Red flags that invite a challenge:

  • Selling or giving assets to yourself, your family, or a company you own for little or nothing.
  • Moving assets right after a lawsuit is filed or threatened.
  • Leaving behind an empty shell while the same business keeps running under a new name.
  • Keeping the transfer quiet.

Talk to a Lawyer Before You Move Anything

If you are thinking about selling your company’s assets or restructuring your business, talk to an experienced business or bankruptcy attorney first. The facts, timing, and structure of the deal are what decide these cases—and those are far easier to get right before the transfer than to defend after it.

If you are struggling with debt or have questions about bankruptcy, the team at Frost Law may be able to help. Call us at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a free consultation. You can also explore our bankruptcy resource center to see what steps might work for your situation.

Footnotes

go to All news articles

Can I Move My Company’s Assets to a New Company to Get Away from Its Debts?

Published on
November 6, 2026
Written By
David Espin
Senior Associate
David Espin
Senior Associate
download pdf
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Businesses with SBA EIDL loans shouldn’t be fooled by this maneuver

When a business is buried in debt, there’s a tempting idea for struggling owners. They start a new company, move the equipment, customer accounts, and money over to it, and leave the old company—and its bills—behind.

There’s a big catch: This idea almost never works. Courts in nearly every state can undo the transfer, make the new company pay the old company’s debts. And, in some cases, the courts go after the owners personally.

This is a particularly important cautionary tale for businesses struggling with delinquent Economic Injury Disaster Loans, or EIDL, given during the pandemic by the Small Business Administration. Some 500,000 of these delinquent loans have been sent over to the Treasury Department’s collection area, which is causing businesses to look for options given the financial stress. Businesses struggling with an EIDL delinquency or need help with a bankruptcy situation can reach out to the team at Frost Law. Call (410) 497-5947 or schedule a free consultation.

For businesses considering moving assets, here is how courts look at these moves, and what separates a legitimate sale from one that will backfire.

Have Questions? Call Our Team Today.

The Starting Point: Buying Assets Usually Does Not Mean Buying Debts

In most states, a company that buys another business’s assets does not automatically become responsible for that business’s debts. The rule makes sense. It lets a struggling company sell what it owns, and it lets the buyer pay a fair price without worrying about bills or lawsuits it does not know about.

But this is only the starting point. Courts follow the rule when the sale is a real deal between independent parties, each looking out for its own interests. When the sale looks like a trick to get away from creditors, the courts set the rule aside. Courts usually rely on two provisions—or tools—to do it—fraudulent transfer law and successor liability.

Tool #1: Fraudulent Transfer Law

Almost every state has a law that lets creditors undo transfers meant to cheat them. Most states use a version of a model law called the Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, or its older version, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. The idea behind these laws is centuries old: You cannot give away or hide property to keep it out of your creditors’ reach.

In this scenario, a creditor can win in one of two ways:

  • Proving the business meant to dodge creditors. The creditor shows the business moved assets to block, delay, or cheat someone it owed money to, now or in the future. Few owners admit to this, so courts look at the surrounding facts for warning signs, which lawyers call “badges of fraud.”
  • Showing the deal was unfair, even with no bad intent. A transfer can be undone if the business got much less than the assets were worth and, at the time, it could not pay its debts or was left without enough money to keep operating.

Common warning signs about these transfers include:

  • The assets went to an insider—an owner, officer, or family member—or to a company with the same owners.
  • The business got little or nothing in return.
  • The transfer happened soon after the business missed payments, was threatened with a lawsuit, or was sued.
  • The business or its owners kept using or controlling the assets after the “sale.”
  • The transfer left the business unable to pay its debts or stripped of its main assets.
  • The sale was kept secret.

If a court finds such a fraudulent transfer, it can cancel the transfer, let the creditor go after the assets in the new owner’s hands, and in some cases order whoever received the assets to pay the creditor directly.

Tool #2: Successor Liability—When the New Company Is Treated as the Old One

Successor liability works differently. Instead of undoing one specific transfer, it makes the new company responsible for the old company’s debts. The rules vary from state to state, but courts generally do this in four situations:

  • The new company is just the old one with a new name. Courts look for the same owners and managers, the same kind of business, the same location, employees, and customers, and a failure to pay fair value for the assets. Courts call this a “mere continuation.”
  • The deal is really a merger. The paperwork may call it an asset sale, but if the two businesses actually combined, a court can treat it as a merger, and the debts come along with it.
  • The sale was designed to escape debts. If the point of the sale was to move assets away from the old company’s creditors, the new company can be held responsible.
  • The buyer agreed to take on the debts. This can happen in the contract itself or through the buyer’s actions, such as paying the old company’s bills.

In practice, the more the new business looks and runs like the old one, the bigger the risk.

Keeping the same name, signs, letterhead, and staff all make the new company look like the old one with a new label. In many states, a key question is whether the same people own and run both companies. Some courts have also said that a creditor does not need to prove an intent to cheat under the “mere continuation” rule. That means a transfer can fail this test even if it would hold up against a fraudulent transfer claim.

Can the Owners Be Personally Liable?

Going after the new company is one thing. Going after the owners personally is another—but creditors have several ways to do it:

  • Suing the people involved. Owners or managers who received assets, or who arranged the transfer, can be named in a fraudulent transfer lawsuit. When a transfer was clearly meant to cheat creditors, the owners may have to pay personally. And, in some cases, they may also have to cover the creditor’s legal costs.
  • “Piercing the corporate veil.” An LLC or corporation normally shields its owners’ personal assets. But if the owners treated the company as an extension of themselves —mixing personal and business money, ignoring basic company formalities, or never putting enough money into the business—a court may disregard the company and hold the owners personally responsible.
  • Bankruptcy. If the old company files for bankruptcy, or its creditors force it into bankruptcy, a bankruptcy trustee can usually challenge transfers made before the filing, including some made years earlier.

Where Is the Line? What to Do and What Not to Do

Restructuring a business is not illegal. Companies sell parts of their business, reorganize for tax or practical reasons, and buy assets from struggling businesses all the time. The question is how the deal is done.

A transfer is much more likely to hold up when:

  • The price is fair market value, backed up by financial statements, an appraisal, or a competitive sale process such as an auction.
  • The buyer is unrelated, and the seller and its owners keep no ownership or control after the sale.
  • The seller can still pay its debts and is not under pressure from a lawsuit or a threatened lawsuit.
  • The deal is openly documented, not hidden.

Red flags that invite a challenge:

  • Selling or giving assets to yourself, your family, or a company you own for little or nothing.
  • Moving assets right after a lawsuit is filed or threatened.
  • Leaving behind an empty shell while the same business keeps running under a new name.
  • Keeping the transfer quiet.

Talk to a Lawyer Before You Move Anything

If you are thinking about selling your company’s assets or restructuring your business, talk to an experienced business or bankruptcy attorney first. The facts, timing, and structure of the deal are what decide these cases—and those are far easier to get right before the transfer than to defend after it.

If you are struggling with debt or have questions about bankruptcy, the team at Frost Law may be able to help. Call us at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a free consultation. You can also explore our bankruptcy resource center to see what steps might work for your situation.

Footnotes