Business owners facing financial difficulties often wait too long to consider bankruptcy—sometimes out of fear, and sometimes out of confusion. But bankruptcy isn’t always a last resort. It can be a strategic move to preserve value, restructure obligations, or wind down with dignity.

Understanding the different types of business bankruptcy—and what each option means for operations, ownership, and financial obligations—is critical to making an informed and strategic decision. This article provides an overview of Chapters 7 and 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, including the streamlined rules for certain small businesses under Subchapter V (of Chapter 11), and explains how each can be used to either close a business or reorganize it for long-term viability.

Have Questions? Call us for Your consultation.

Traditional Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: Reorganization

Chapter 11 allows a debtor’s business to continue operating while it develops a plan to reorganize its financial obligations. It is often used by larger businesses to restructure their balance sheets, shed unprofitable contracts, and emerge as more competitive and viable entities.

When is a Traditional Chapter 11 Bankruptcy the Right Choice?

A traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy is typically considered when a business is fundamentally sound yet weighed down by unsustainable debt. It offers a court-supervised framework to restructure debts and obligations without completely erasing them. This path is particularly beneficial when a business needs to renegotiate burdensome contracts or leases, such as those for real estate or equipment, as well as when the business needs to secure new financing or adjust existing debt repayment schedules.

Key Characteristics

A traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy case begins with the filing of a petition, which must include a comprehensive statement of financial affairs and a schedule of assets, liabilities, contracts, expenditures, and leases.1 Upon filing, the existing management usually remains in control of the business, operating as a “debtor-in-possession” (DIP),2 while the automatic stay immediately halts most collection efforts and lawsuits.3 Management may then review existing contracts and leases and choose to keep or reject those that negatively impact profitability.4 Ultimately, the business must propose a detailed reorganization plan that (1) satisfies the absolute priority rule,5 meaning senior creditors are paid in full before junior creditors or equity holders can receive any payments, and (2) is approved by a vote of impaired creditors and confirmed by the court.6

If the proposed plan fails to secure the support of all impaired creditor classes, the DIP may still seek confirmation through what is known as a “cramdown.”7 Under this mechanism, the court can approve the plan over the objection of dissenting classes if it determines that the plan does not “discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to each non-consenting, impaired class of claims.8 This process allows financially distressed businesses to move forward with reorganization even in the face of creditor resistance, provided the statutory requirements under the Bankruptcy Code are met.9

Rejection of Contracts or Leases and Valuing Collateral

One of the most valuable features of Chapter 11 is the ability of a DIP to modify certain contractual obligations. Under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor can choose to assume (keep), assume and assign (keep and transfer to another party), or reject (terminate) executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to court approval.10 For example, commercial real estate leases must generally be assumed or rejected within 120 days of filing a petition (which the court can extend by 90 days) to avoid automatic rejection.11 If a contract or lease is rejected at filing, it is treated as if the breach occurred immediately before the petition was filed.12 This operation of law converts a counterparty’s claim into a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages.13 The power to reject often gives debtors significant leverage to renegotiate key contract terms—such as lowering rent under a burdensome lease or adjusting service contracts—since counterparties generally prefer payments to be made under an ongoing lease or contract rather than as a result of an unsecured claim, which may be worth significantly less.

Another practical feature of Chapter 11 is the process for valuing the collateral of secured creditors.14 Section 506 allows the court to re-evaluate a creditor’s status by determining the current market value of the collateral that secures its claim. After doing so, only the portion of the debt equal to the collateral’s actual value remains secured, while the remainder is reclassified as unsecured debt, which is frequently repaid at a significant discount.15 This process can help businesses reduce their overall debt and increase the likelihood of a successful reorganization.

Limitations

While Chapter 11 offers significant advantages, it remains a complex and oftentimes expensive ordeal. The proceedings may take several years to conclude, and the business will incur professional fees to engage lawyers, financial advisors, and accountants. Additionally, creditor committees may form to represent the interests of unsecured creditors, and those committees may oppose the management’s proposed restructuring plan, leading to further negotiation and conflict. Therefore, thorough preparation and experienced legal counsel are essential for a successful Chapter 11 reorganization.

Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) Bankruptcy: Streamlined Reorganization for Small Businesses

Enacted under the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Subchapter V offers a simplified and more cost-effective option for reorganizing eligible small businesses. It allows these businesses to restructure debt and continue operations (retaining the core benefits of Chapter 11) while reducing some of the associated complexity and expense.

Eligibility

To be eligible under Subchapter V,16 a business must have aggregate noncontingent, liquidated, secured, and unsecured debts totaling no more than $3,424,000 (which is adjusted every three years for inflation).17 Additionally, the business must be engaged in commercial or business activities, with over 50 percent of its total debt arising from these activities.18 Eligible debtors generally include small business corporations, partnerships, and individuals who operate commercial enterprises, but not those specifically excluded under the Bankruptcy Code, such as single-asset real estate owners and publicly traded companies.19

When is Subchapter V the Best Choice?

Subchapter V is an ideal choice for businesses that meet the debt limits and seek to restructure rather than liquidate. It is particularly appealing for businesses seeking a faster, less adversarial process. For example, owners interested in retaining equity in the company may be able to do so without obtaining creditor consent, a significant advantage over a traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Key Characteristics and Benefits

Subchapter V introduced several important changes designed to streamline the reorganization process for small businesses.20 In every Subchapter V case, a trustee is appointed and tasked with facilitating a consensual reorganization plan between the debtor and creditors.21 Further, the Bankruptcy Code requires the court to hold a status conference within the first 60 days of the commencement of the case, and the debtor is required to file a detailed report outlining efforts to obtain creditor consent to a plan no less than 14 days prior to the meeting.22

A key benefit of Subchapter V is the reduced administrative burden: a formal disclosure statement is typically not required, and there is generally no unsecured creditors' committee (unless the court orders that one be organized).23 Additionally, only the debtor can file a reorganization plan, which must be submitted within 90 days of the petition date; however, extensions may be granted when “the need for an extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable.”24 Debtors in Subchapter V cases are also exempt from paying quarterly fees to the United States Trustee, further reducing overall costs.25

Reorganization plans, like those in traditional Chapter 11 cases, can be confirmed either by the consent of the creditors or through the “cramdown” process.26 However, in the context of a Subchapter V case, a plan is considered “fair and equitable” if the debtor commits all of their “projected disposable income” (or its value) to payments over the life of the plan.27 Therefore, Subchapter V plans do not need to comply with the traditional Chapter 11 “absolute priority rule” and may provide for owners to retain equity even if creditors are not paid in full.28

Limitations

While Subchapter V cases are designed to be affordable, simplified, and efficient, the debt limit, stricter timeline, and lack of judicial precedent may pose challenges for some debtors, limiting flexibility and creating uncertainty in how certain issues are resolved.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Liquidation

When a corporate debtor files for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the business generally ceases operations.29 A Chapter 7 Trustee (“the trustee”) then takes control of the business’s non-exempt assets, sells them, and distributes the cash proceeds to creditors following the priority rules set out in the Bankruptcy Code. Unlike reorganization under a traditional Chapter 11 or Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) reorganization, Chapter 7 focuses solely on winding down the business in an orderly manner rather than attempting to continue operations.

When is Chapter 7 the Best Choice?

A Chapter 7 bankruptcy is often chosen when the business has no viable path forward, has few or no valuable assets to use to reorganize, or when management concludes that reorganization is not economically feasible. For many, the primary goal in any liquidation becomes an orderly wind-down of the business’s affairs and addressing its outstanding debts as best as possible.

Key Characteristics

Under Chapter 7 procedures, there is no plan of reorganization; instead, the trustee sells assets and distributes the proceeds to creditors. Notably, because equity holders stand last in the order of repayment, small business owners usually do not receive any proceeds.

Limitations

One of the most significant limitations of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is that a business entity does not receive a discharge of its debts.30 As a result of the filing, creditors may still pursue any other individuals or entities that personally guaranteed the debts.31 Further, certain liabilities—such as trust fund taxes and debts incurred through fraud—remain the responsibility of the individuals involved.32

Beyond the lack of discharge, Chapter 7 offers no opportunity to restructure debts or continue operating the business. Once the case is filed, control of the debtor company shifts to the trustee, who manages the liquidation process and acts in the best interests of the unsecured creditors. A business ceases to exist following the liquidation.

We know the ins and outs of bankruptcy can be overwhelming, but Frost Law’s team of seasoned professionals are ready to help your business every step of the way, contact us at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a confidential consultation here.

Footnotes

  1. See 11 U.S.C. § 521(a); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(b) (listing required schedules and statement of financial affairs).
  2. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1101(1), 1107(a).
  3. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
  4. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 365 (trustee or debtor-in-possession may assume or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases).
  5. See 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) (absolute priority rule).
  6. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1126 (voting), 1129(a) (confirmation requirements).
  7. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b) (authorizing cramdown over rejecting classes).
  8. Id.
  9. See Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1129.04 (discussing cramdown standards).
  10. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 365
  11. 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4)(A)–(B).
  12. 11 U.S.C. § 365(g)(1). If not rejected on the filing date, the debtor may be responsible for payments that will be due at confirmation.
  13. See In re Health Diagnostic Lab., Inc., 557 B.R. 885, 894 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2016); see also 11 U.S.C § 502(b)(6) (capping landlord claims).
  14. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 506
  15. See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 506.04, p. 506–15 (15th ed. 1988) (“[S]ection 506(a) requires a bifurcation of a ‘partially secured’ or ‘undersecured’ claim into separate and independent secured claim and unsecured claim components.”).
  16. See In re Hillman, No. 22-10175, 2023 WL 3804195 at *3 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. June 2, 2023) (“The Bankruptcy Code sets the following four requirements for a debtor to be eligible for subchapter V: (1) meet the definition of a ‘person’; (2) be ‘engaged in commercial or business activities’; (3) have ‘aggregate noncontingent liquidated secured and unsecured debts as of the date of the filing of the petition ... in an amount not more than [$3,424,000] ...’; and (4) ‘not less than 50 percent of which arose from the commercial or business activities of the debtor....’”); 11 U.S.C. § 101(41) (“The term ‘person’ includes individual, partnership, and corporation, but does not include governmental unit.”).
  17. See 11 U.S.C. § 1182(1); 11 U.S.C. § 104; 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D).
  18. 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D); see also In re Hillman, 2023 BL 189228, No. 22-10175 (June 2, 2023) (citing In re Port Arthur Steam Energy, L.P., 629 B.R. 233, 237 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2021)) (adopting a totality of the circumstances test to determine whether the debtor was “engaged in commercial or business activities,” imposing a nexus requirement between the debtor’s business activities relied upon for Subchapter V eligibility and the debt used to meet the 50% threshold, and clarifying that “a debtor can qualify for a Subchapter V absent the company's traditional business operations where the company is winding down.”).
  19. Id.; see also In re ENKOGS1, LLC, 626 B.R. 860, 863-65 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2021) (citing In re Iowa Hotel Invs., LLC, 464 B.R. 848, 851 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2011)) (stating that a debtor must meet all three of the following prongs to be classified as a “single asset real estate” debtor: “(1) [T]he debtor must have real property constituting a single property or project [other than residential real property with fewer than 4 residential units], (2) which generates substantially all of the gross income of the debtor, and (3) on which no substantial business is conducted other than the business of operating the real property and activities incidental thereto,” and holding that a hotel which provides services in addition to nightly room rentals is not a single asset real estate debtor, even if no extra income is earned from those services); 11 U.S.C. § 101(51B).
  20. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1181–1195; Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116–54.
  21. 11 U.S.C. § 1183(b)(7).
  22. 11 U.S.C. § 1188(a)–(c).
  23. 11 U.S.C. § 1181(b).
  24. See In re Trinity Legacy Consortium, LLC, 656 B.R. 429, 435-39 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2023) (comparing the three approaches to defining the standard in Section 1189(b): (1) the “circumstances beyond the debtor’s control” standard; (2) the four-factor test from In re Baker; and (3) the “equitable inquiry” standard found in In re Trepetin, which the court adopted); compare In re Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp., 618 B.R. 333 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2020) (applying the circumstances beyond the debtor’s control standard and finding that “[b]ased on a plain reading of [the standard for an extension], it is a clearly higher standard than the mere ‘for cause’ standard set forth in both Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006(b) (governing extensions of time generally) and Bankruptcy Code section 1121(d)(1) (governing extensions of a non-Subchapter V debtor’s exclusive period to file a Chapter 11 plan).”), with In re Baker, 625 B.R. 27, 35 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2020) (applying a four-factor test to determine whether to extend the time to file a Subchapter V plan under § 1189(b): “(1) whether the circumstances raised by Debtor were within his control, (2) whether Debtor has made progress in drafting a plan, (3) whether the deficiencies preventing that draft from being filed are reasonably related to the identified circumstances, and (4) whether any party-in-interest has moved to dismiss or convert Debtor’s case or otherwise objected to a deadline extension in any way.”), and In re Trepetin, 617 B.R. 841 (Bankr. D. Md. 2020) (defining the terms “justly” and “accountable” in § 1189(b) and holding that “[t]he question thus becomes whether the Debtor is fairly responsible for his inability to timely submit his status report, attend the status conference, or file a plan in this Subchapter V case.”).
  25. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a)(6)(A).
  26. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(a)–(b).
  27. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c).
  28. Id.
  29. But see 11 U.S.C. § 721 (authorizing a Chapter 7 Trustee to operate the business for a limited period of time, if such operation is in the best interest of the estate).
  30. 11 U.S.C. § 727 (only an individual is eligible for a Chapter 7 discharge).
  31. See 11 U.S.C. § 524(e); Bel-Ken Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Clark, 83 B.R. 357 (D. Md. 1988) (noting that 11 U.S.C. § 524(e) “has been cited in a number of cases which hold that a guarantor's liability remains even after the bankrupt principal is released from liability.”); see also Dulles Elec. & Supply Corp. v. Shaffer (In re Shaffer), 585 B.R. 224 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2018) (holding that guarantors of business debts, who had subsequently filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in their individual capacities but had not rescinded or revoked the continuing guaranty, were liable for business debts incurred postpetition).
  32. 11 U.S.C. § 523; 26 U.S.C. § 6672.
go to All news articles

Fix It or Fold It? Deciding Between a Chapter 11 Reorganization (Including Streamlined Options Under Subchapter V) and a Chapter 7 Liquidation

Published on
July 25, 2025
Author
download pdf
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Business owners facing financial difficulties often wait too long to consider bankruptcy—sometimes out of fear, and sometimes out of confusion. But bankruptcy isn’t always a last resort. It can be a strategic move to preserve value, restructure obligations, or wind down with dignity.

Understanding the different types of business bankruptcy—and what each option means for operations, ownership, and financial obligations—is critical to making an informed and strategic decision. This article provides an overview of Chapters 7 and 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, including the streamlined rules for certain small businesses under Subchapter V (of Chapter 11), and explains how each can be used to either close a business or reorganize it for long-term viability.

Have Questions? Call Our Team Today.

Traditional Chapter 11 Bankruptcy: Reorganization

Chapter 11 allows a debtor’s business to continue operating while it develops a plan to reorganize its financial obligations. It is often used by larger businesses to restructure their balance sheets, shed unprofitable contracts, and emerge as more competitive and viable entities.

When is a Traditional Chapter 11 Bankruptcy the Right Choice?

A traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy is typically considered when a business is fundamentally sound yet weighed down by unsustainable debt. It offers a court-supervised framework to restructure debts and obligations without completely erasing them. This path is particularly beneficial when a business needs to renegotiate burdensome contracts or leases, such as those for real estate or equipment, as well as when the business needs to secure new financing or adjust existing debt repayment schedules.

Key Characteristics

A traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy case begins with the filing of a petition, which must include a comprehensive statement of financial affairs and a schedule of assets, liabilities, contracts, expenditures, and leases.1 Upon filing, the existing management usually remains in control of the business, operating as a “debtor-in-possession” (DIP),2 while the automatic stay immediately halts most collection efforts and lawsuits.3 Management may then review existing contracts and leases and choose to keep or reject those that negatively impact profitability.4 Ultimately, the business must propose a detailed reorganization plan that (1) satisfies the absolute priority rule,5 meaning senior creditors are paid in full before junior creditors or equity holders can receive any payments, and (2) is approved by a vote of impaired creditors and confirmed by the court.6

If the proposed plan fails to secure the support of all impaired creditor classes, the DIP may still seek confirmation through what is known as a “cramdown.”7 Under this mechanism, the court can approve the plan over the objection of dissenting classes if it determines that the plan does not “discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable” with respect to each non-consenting, impaired class of claims.8 This process allows financially distressed businesses to move forward with reorganization even in the face of creditor resistance, provided the statutory requirements under the Bankruptcy Code are met.9

Rejection of Contracts or Leases and Valuing Collateral

One of the most valuable features of Chapter 11 is the ability of a DIP to modify certain contractual obligations. Under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor can choose to assume (keep), assume and assign (keep and transfer to another party), or reject (terminate) executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to court approval.10 For example, commercial real estate leases must generally be assumed or rejected within 120 days of filing a petition (which the court can extend by 90 days) to avoid automatic rejection.11 If a contract or lease is rejected at filing, it is treated as if the breach occurred immediately before the petition was filed.12 This operation of law converts a counterparty’s claim into a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages.13 The power to reject often gives debtors significant leverage to renegotiate key contract terms—such as lowering rent under a burdensome lease or adjusting service contracts—since counterparties generally prefer payments to be made under an ongoing lease or contract rather than as a result of an unsecured claim, which may be worth significantly less.

Another practical feature of Chapter 11 is the process for valuing the collateral of secured creditors.14 Section 506 allows the court to re-evaluate a creditor’s status by determining the current market value of the collateral that secures its claim. After doing so, only the portion of the debt equal to the collateral’s actual value remains secured, while the remainder is reclassified as unsecured debt, which is frequently repaid at a significant discount.15 This process can help businesses reduce their overall debt and increase the likelihood of a successful reorganization.

Limitations

While Chapter 11 offers significant advantages, it remains a complex and oftentimes expensive ordeal. The proceedings may take several years to conclude, and the business will incur professional fees to engage lawyers, financial advisors, and accountants. Additionally, creditor committees may form to represent the interests of unsecured creditors, and those committees may oppose the management’s proposed restructuring plan, leading to further negotiation and conflict. Therefore, thorough preparation and experienced legal counsel are essential for a successful Chapter 11 reorganization.

Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) Bankruptcy: Streamlined Reorganization for Small Businesses

Enacted under the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Subchapter V offers a simplified and more cost-effective option for reorganizing eligible small businesses. It allows these businesses to restructure debt and continue operations (retaining the core benefits of Chapter 11) while reducing some of the associated complexity and expense.

Eligibility

To be eligible under Subchapter V,16 a business must have aggregate noncontingent, liquidated, secured, and unsecured debts totaling no more than $3,424,000 (which is adjusted every three years for inflation).17 Additionally, the business must be engaged in commercial or business activities, with over 50 percent of its total debt arising from these activities.18 Eligible debtors generally include small business corporations, partnerships, and individuals who operate commercial enterprises, but not those specifically excluded under the Bankruptcy Code, such as single-asset real estate owners and publicly traded companies.19

When is Subchapter V the Best Choice?

Subchapter V is an ideal choice for businesses that meet the debt limits and seek to restructure rather than liquidate. It is particularly appealing for businesses seeking a faster, less adversarial process. For example, owners interested in retaining equity in the company may be able to do so without obtaining creditor consent, a significant advantage over a traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Key Characteristics and Benefits

Subchapter V introduced several important changes designed to streamline the reorganization process for small businesses.20 In every Subchapter V case, a trustee is appointed and tasked with facilitating a consensual reorganization plan between the debtor and creditors.21 Further, the Bankruptcy Code requires the court to hold a status conference within the first 60 days of the commencement of the case, and the debtor is required to file a detailed report outlining efforts to obtain creditor consent to a plan no less than 14 days prior to the meeting.22

A key benefit of Subchapter V is the reduced administrative burden: a formal disclosure statement is typically not required, and there is generally no unsecured creditors' committee (unless the court orders that one be organized).23 Additionally, only the debtor can file a reorganization plan, which must be submitted within 90 days of the petition date; however, extensions may be granted when “the need for an extension is attributable to circumstances for which the debtor should not justly be held accountable.”24 Debtors in Subchapter V cases are also exempt from paying quarterly fees to the United States Trustee, further reducing overall costs.25

Reorganization plans, like those in traditional Chapter 11 cases, can be confirmed either by the consent of the creditors or through the “cramdown” process.26 However, in the context of a Subchapter V case, a plan is considered “fair and equitable” if the debtor commits all of their “projected disposable income” (or its value) to payments over the life of the plan.27 Therefore, Subchapter V plans do not need to comply with the traditional Chapter 11 “absolute priority rule” and may provide for owners to retain equity even if creditors are not paid in full.28

Limitations

While Subchapter V cases are designed to be affordable, simplified, and efficient, the debt limit, stricter timeline, and lack of judicial precedent may pose challenges for some debtors, limiting flexibility and creating uncertainty in how certain issues are resolved.

Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Liquidation

When a corporate debtor files for bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the business generally ceases operations.29 A Chapter 7 Trustee (“the trustee”) then takes control of the business’s non-exempt assets, sells them, and distributes the cash proceeds to creditors following the priority rules set out in the Bankruptcy Code. Unlike reorganization under a traditional Chapter 11 or Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) reorganization, Chapter 7 focuses solely on winding down the business in an orderly manner rather than attempting to continue operations.

When is Chapter 7 the Best Choice?

A Chapter 7 bankruptcy is often chosen when the business has no viable path forward, has few or no valuable assets to use to reorganize, or when management concludes that reorganization is not economically feasible. For many, the primary goal in any liquidation becomes an orderly wind-down of the business’s affairs and addressing its outstanding debts as best as possible.

Key Characteristics

Under Chapter 7 procedures, there is no plan of reorganization; instead, the trustee sells assets and distributes the proceeds to creditors. Notably, because equity holders stand last in the order of repayment, small business owners usually do not receive any proceeds.

Limitations

One of the most significant limitations of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy is that a business entity does not receive a discharge of its debts.30 As a result of the filing, creditors may still pursue any other individuals or entities that personally guaranteed the debts.31 Further, certain liabilities—such as trust fund taxes and debts incurred through fraud—remain the responsibility of the individuals involved.32

Beyond the lack of discharge, Chapter 7 offers no opportunity to restructure debts or continue operating the business. Once the case is filed, control of the debtor company shifts to the trustee, who manages the liquidation process and acts in the best interests of the unsecured creditors. A business ceases to exist following the liquidation.

We know the ins and outs of bankruptcy can be overwhelming, but Frost Law’s team of seasoned professionals are ready to help your business every step of the way, contact us at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a confidential consultation here.

Footnotes

  1. See 11 U.S.C. § 521(a); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1007(b) (listing required schedules and statement of financial affairs).
  2. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1101(1), 1107(a).
  3. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
  4. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 365 (trustee or debtor-in-possession may assume or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases).
  5. See 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii) (absolute priority rule).
  6. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1126 (voting), 1129(a) (confirmation requirements).
  7. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b) (authorizing cramdown over rejecting classes).
  8. Id.
  9. See Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1129.04 (discussing cramdown standards).
  10. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 365
  11. 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4)(A)–(B).
  12. 11 U.S.C. § 365(g)(1). If not rejected on the filing date, the debtor may be responsible for payments that will be due at confirmation.
  13. See In re Health Diagnostic Lab., Inc., 557 B.R. 885, 894 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2016); see also 11 U.S.C § 502(b)(6) (capping landlord claims).
  14. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 506
  15. See 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 506.04, p. 506–15 (15th ed. 1988) (“[S]ection 506(a) requires a bifurcation of a ‘partially secured’ or ‘undersecured’ claim into separate and independent secured claim and unsecured claim components.”).
  16. See In re Hillman, No. 22-10175, 2023 WL 3804195 at *3 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. June 2, 2023) (“The Bankruptcy Code sets the following four requirements for a debtor to be eligible for subchapter V: (1) meet the definition of a ‘person’; (2) be ‘engaged in commercial or business activities’; (3) have ‘aggregate noncontingent liquidated secured and unsecured debts as of the date of the filing of the petition ... in an amount not more than [$3,424,000] ...’; and (4) ‘not less than 50 percent of which arose from the commercial or business activities of the debtor....’”); 11 U.S.C. § 101(41) (“The term ‘person’ includes individual, partnership, and corporation, but does not include governmental unit.”).
  17. See 11 U.S.C. § 1182(1); 11 U.S.C. § 104; 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D).
  18. 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D); see also In re Hillman, 2023 BL 189228, No. 22-10175 (June 2, 2023) (citing In re Port Arthur Steam Energy, L.P., 629 B.R. 233, 237 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2021)) (adopting a totality of the circumstances test to determine whether the debtor was “engaged in commercial or business activities,” imposing a nexus requirement between the debtor’s business activities relied upon for Subchapter V eligibility and the debt used to meet the 50% threshold, and clarifying that “a debtor can qualify for a Subchapter V absent the company's traditional business operations where the company is winding down.”).
  19. Id.; see also In re ENKOGS1, LLC, 626 B.R. 860, 863-65 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2021) (citing In re Iowa Hotel Invs., LLC, 464 B.R. 848, 851 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2011)) (stating that a debtor must meet all three of the following prongs to be classified as a “single asset real estate” debtor: “(1) [T]he debtor must have real property constituting a single property or project [other than residential real property with fewer than 4 residential units], (2) which generates substantially all of the gross income of the debtor, and (3) on which no substantial business is conducted other than the business of operating the real property and activities incidental thereto,” and holding that a hotel which provides services in addition to nightly room rentals is not a single asset real estate debtor, even if no extra income is earned from those services); 11 U.S.C. § 101(51B).
  20. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 1181–1195; Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Pub. L. No. 116–54.
  21. 11 U.S.C. § 1183(b)(7).
  22. 11 U.S.C. § 1188(a)–(c).
  23. 11 U.S.C. § 1181(b).
  24. See In re Trinity Legacy Consortium, LLC, 656 B.R. 429, 435-39 (Bankr. D.N.M. 2023) (comparing the three approaches to defining the standard in Section 1189(b): (1) the “circumstances beyond the debtor’s control” standard; (2) the four-factor test from In re Baker; and (3) the “equitable inquiry” standard found in In re Trepetin, which the court adopted); compare In re Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp., 618 B.R. 333 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2020) (applying the circumstances beyond the debtor’s control standard and finding that “[b]ased on a plain reading of [the standard for an extension], it is a clearly higher standard than the mere ‘for cause’ standard set forth in both Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006(b) (governing extensions of time generally) and Bankruptcy Code section 1121(d)(1) (governing extensions of a non-Subchapter V debtor’s exclusive period to file a Chapter 11 plan).”), with In re Baker, 625 B.R. 27, 35 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2020) (applying a four-factor test to determine whether to extend the time to file a Subchapter V plan under § 1189(b): “(1) whether the circumstances raised by Debtor were within his control, (2) whether Debtor has made progress in drafting a plan, (3) whether the deficiencies preventing that draft from being filed are reasonably related to the identified circumstances, and (4) whether any party-in-interest has moved to dismiss or convert Debtor’s case or otherwise objected to a deadline extension in any way.”), and In re Trepetin, 617 B.R. 841 (Bankr. D. Md. 2020) (defining the terms “justly” and “accountable” in § 1189(b) and holding that “[t]he question thus becomes whether the Debtor is fairly responsible for his inability to timely submit his status report, attend the status conference, or file a plan in this Subchapter V case.”).
  25. 28 U.S.C. § 1930(a)(6)(A).
  26. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(a)–(b).
  27. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c).
  28. Id.
  29. But see 11 U.S.C. § 721 (authorizing a Chapter 7 Trustee to operate the business for a limited period of time, if such operation is in the best interest of the estate).
  30. 11 U.S.C. § 727 (only an individual is eligible for a Chapter 7 discharge).
  31. See 11 U.S.C. § 524(e); Bel-Ken Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Clark, 83 B.R. 357 (D. Md. 1988) (noting that 11 U.S.C. § 524(e) “has been cited in a number of cases which hold that a guarantor's liability remains even after the bankrupt principal is released from liability.”); see also Dulles Elec. & Supply Corp. v. Shaffer (In re Shaffer), 585 B.R. 224 (Bankr. W.D. Va. 2018) (holding that guarantors of business debts, who had subsequently filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in their individual capacities but had not rescinded or revoked the continuing guaranty, were liable for business debts incurred postpetition).
  32. 11 U.S.C. § 523; 26 U.S.C. § 6672.