For individuals and businesses facing financial distress, bankruptcy offers a structured path towards a fresh start or reorganization. A critical step in any bankruptcy case is the confirmation of a repayment or reorganization plan. Completion of the plan is typically what entitles the debtor to a discharge. The plan outlines how the debtor will address their debts, and its approval by the bankruptcy court is essential for the case to proceed. While the fundamental goal of confirmation remains consistent across different chapters, the specific requirements vary significantly depending on the type of bankruptcy filed.

This continuing series provides an overview today of the key requirements for confirming a bankruptcy plan under Chapter 11 Subchapter V of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Have Questions? Call us for Your consultation.

Chapter 11, Subchapter V: Streamlined Reorganization for Small Businesses

Enacted under the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) offers a simplified and more cost-effective option for reorganizing eligible small businesses.1 It allows these businesses to restructure debt and continue operations (retaining the core benefits of Chapter 11) while reducing some of the associated complexity and expense.

Consensual Plans

A bankruptcy court shall confirm a consensual Subchapter V plan once all the requirements of a traditional Chapter 11 plan are met, apart from the absolute priority rule.2

  • Impaired3 Class Acceptance: For a Subchapter V plan to be considered consensual, all impaired classes must accept the plan.4 This is consistent with traditional Chapter 11 plans.
  • Benefits of Consensus: A Subchapter V debtor is strongly encouraged to negotiate a consensual plan due to specific advantages not available in a non-consensual context:
    • Trustee Termination: The service of a Subchapter V trustee terminates when a consensual plan is substantially consummated.5 This directly reduces the fees and expenses that would otherwise be incurred and paid by the estate over the plan's life.
    • Immediate Discharge: The debtor receives an immediate discharge upon confirmation of a consensual plan.6 This provides a faster financial fresh start compared to a cramdown plan.

Cramdown Plans

Like traditional Chapter 11 cramdown plans, a Subchapter V cramdown plan may be confirmed over the objection of impaired classes so long as the plan does not “discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable.” However, these standards are interpreted differently in the context of Subchapter V plans.

  • Fundamental Requirements: A Subchapter V plan may be confirmed through the cramdown process once the requirements for a traditional Chapter 11 plan are satisfied, except for 11 U.S.C. §§ 1129(a)(8) (unanimous class consent),7 (10) (approval by at least one impaired class),8 and (15) (absolute priority rule).9
  • No Unfair Discrimination: As in traditional Chapter 11 cramdowns, the plan must not discriminate unfairly against any impaired, non-consenting class. This means similarly situated claims should receive comparable treatment, and any differences must have a reasonable basis and be proposed in good faith.10
  • Fair and Equitable Treatment: The “fair and equitable” standard for dissenting classes of impaired claims is significantly altered in Subchapter V:
    • Secured Claims: For dissenting classes of impaired secured claims, the plan must still meet the existing “fair and equitable” requirements for secured claims under traditional Chapter 11 plans.11
    • Unsecured Claims: The Disposable Income Test: For dissenting classes of unsecured claims, 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(2) establishes a unique disposable income test that replaces the absolute priority rule found in traditional Chapter 11. The plan must provide that, as of the effective date:
      • All of the debtor's projected disposable income received within the first three to five years of the plan will be applied to make payments under the plan; or
      • The value of the property distributed under the plan within the first three to five years is not less than the debtor's projected disposable income.
      • “Disposable Income” Defined: “disposable income” for Subchapter V plans means income not reasonably necessary for the maintenance or support of the debtor or their dependents, domestic support obligations payable post-petition, or for the continuation, preservation, or operation of the debtor’s business.12 This definition allows small business debtors to fund their plans with projected profits from their ongoing operations.
  • Feasibility and Remedies: The plan must also demonstrate that the debtor either (1) can make all payments under the plan, or (2) has a reasonable likelihood of doing so and provides appropriate remedies (including potential liquidation of nonexempt assets) if payments are not made.13 This strengthens the feasibility review beyond that of traditional Chapter 11 cases.14
  • No Absolute Priority Rule: A key difference from traditional Chapter 11 is that the absolute priority rule does not apply in Subchapter V cramdown cases. This allows existing equity owners to retain their ownership interests under a cramdown plan, even if unsecured creditors are not paid in full, without needing to contribute new value. This is a significant advantage for small business owners seeking to retain control of their enterprises.
  • Payment of Postpetition Administrative Expenses: Unlike traditional Chapter 11, where postpetition administrative expenses (e.g., professional fees, post-petition goods and services) are typically required to be paid in full and in cash on the plan's effective date, Subchapter V permits these expenses to be paid over the three-to-five-year period of the plan.15 This provides crucial cash flow flexibility for the debtor during reorganization.

Effects of Confirming a Cramdown Plan

While offering greater flexibility, confirming a Subchapter V cramdown plan carries different consequences for the debtor compared to a consensual plan:

  • Expanded Estate Property: If a cramdown plan is confirmed, property of the estate includes not only the debtor's pre-petition property under 11 U.S.C. § 541(a), but also the debtor’s post-petition acquired property and earnings from services performed until the case is closed, dismissed, or converted.16 This provision ensures that after-acquired property contributes to funding the cramdown plan and maintains judicial oversight of the debtor's assets and earnings.
  • Delayed Discharge: The immediate discharge provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d) do not apply. Instead, the debtor in a cramdown plan does not receive a discharge until they complete all payments under the plan, which can take three to five years.17 Even upon discharge, certain debts are not discharged, including any debt where the last payment is due after the plan's payment period and debts specified in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) (e.g., certain taxes, student loans, debts incurred by fraud).
  • Continued Trustee Involvement: The Subchapter V trustee remains in the case throughout the plan's duration to oversee and make payments, adding to the costs borne by the debtor's estate.18

In summary, 11 U.S.C. § 1191 significantly customizes the confirmation process for Subchapter V debtors, offering a more streamlined and debtor-friendly approach, particularly in cramdown scenarios, by relaxing several stringent requirements found in general Chapter 11. However, these benefits are balanced by continued oversight and a delayed discharge in non-consensual cases.

Conclusion

Confirming a bankruptcy plan is a multifaceted process, with each chapter of the Bankruptcy Code presenting unique challenges and requirements. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for debtors, creditors, and legal professionals alike. While the “best interests of creditors” and “feasibility” tests are common threads, the nuanced differences, found in the cramdown provisions, for example, reflect the distinct purposes and policy considerations behind each bankruptcy Chapter. 

While successfully navigating the plan confirmation process can seem overwhelming, Frost Law’s dedicated team of bankruptcy professionals is here to help clients meet these challenges, offering experienced and personalized guidance throughout the entire process. Contact our team today at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a confidential consultation.

Continue to Part 3

Footnotes

  1. To be eligible under Subchapter V, a business must have aggregate noncontingent, liquidated, secured, and unsecured debts totaling no more than $3,424,000 (a threshold adjusted every three years for inflation). Additionally, the business must be engaged in commercial or business activities, with over 50 percent of its total debt arising from these activities. Eligible debtors generally include small business corporations, partnerships, and individuals who operate commercial enterprises, but not those specifically excluded under the Bankruptcy Code, such as single-asset real estate owners and publicly traded companies. See 11 U.S.C. § 1182; 11 U.S.C. § 104; 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D).
  2. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(a).
  3. A claim is considered impaired if the bankruptcy plan alters the legal, equitable, and contractual rights of the claim holder. 11 U.S.C. § 1124(1). This type of claim holder has the right to vote in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan.
  4. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8).
  5. 11 U.S.C. § 1183(c).
  6. 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d).
  7. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8) (“With respect to each class of claims or interests—(A) such class has accepted the plan; or (B) such class is not impaired under the plan.”).
  8. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(10) (“If a class of claims is impaired under the plan, at least one class of claims that is impaired under the plan has accepted the plan, determined without including any acceptance of the plan by any insider.”).
  9. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(15) (“In a case in which the debtor is an individual and in which the holder of an allowed unsecured claim objects to the confirmation of the plan—(A) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of the property to be distributed under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the amount of such claim; or (B) the value of the property to be distributed under the plan is not less than the projected disposable income of the debtor (as defined in section 1325(b)(2)) to be received during the 5-year period beginning on the date that the first payment is due under the plan, or during the period for which the plan provides payments, whichever is longer.”).
  10. See supra note 15; see also In re Ratledge, 31 B.R. 897, 898 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983) (considering the following when determining the fairness of discrimination under the plan: (1) whether there is a reasonable basis for the discrimination; (2) whether the debtor can confirm a plan without the discrimination; (3) whether the discrimination is proposed in good faith; and (4) the manner in which the discriminated class is treated under the plan).
  11. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(A); 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(1).
  12. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(d).
  13. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(3).
  14. See 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(11).
  15. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(e).
  16. 11 U.S.C. § 1186(a).
  17. 11 U.S.C. § 1192.
  18. 11 U.S.C. § 1194.
go to All news articles

Navigating Bankruptcy: Understanding Plan Confirmation Requirements Across Chapters Part 2

Published on
October 7, 2025
Author
download pdf
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

For individuals and businesses facing financial distress, bankruptcy offers a structured path towards a fresh start or reorganization. A critical step in any bankruptcy case is the confirmation of a repayment or reorganization plan. Completion of the plan is typically what entitles the debtor to a discharge. The plan outlines how the debtor will address their debts, and its approval by the bankruptcy court is essential for the case to proceed. While the fundamental goal of confirmation remains consistent across different chapters, the specific requirements vary significantly depending on the type of bankruptcy filed.

This continuing series provides an overview today of the key requirements for confirming a bankruptcy plan under Chapter 11 Subchapter V of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Have Questions? Call Our Team Today.

Chapter 11, Subchapter V: Streamlined Reorganization for Small Businesses

Enacted under the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, Subchapter V (of Chapter 11) offers a simplified and more cost-effective option for reorganizing eligible small businesses.1 It allows these businesses to restructure debt and continue operations (retaining the core benefits of Chapter 11) while reducing some of the associated complexity and expense.

Consensual Plans

A bankruptcy court shall confirm a consensual Subchapter V plan once all the requirements of a traditional Chapter 11 plan are met, apart from the absolute priority rule.2

  • Impaired3 Class Acceptance: For a Subchapter V plan to be considered consensual, all impaired classes must accept the plan.4 This is consistent with traditional Chapter 11 plans.
  • Benefits of Consensus: A Subchapter V debtor is strongly encouraged to negotiate a consensual plan due to specific advantages not available in a non-consensual context:
    • Trustee Termination: The service of a Subchapter V trustee terminates when a consensual plan is substantially consummated.5 This directly reduces the fees and expenses that would otherwise be incurred and paid by the estate over the plan's life.
    • Immediate Discharge: The debtor receives an immediate discharge upon confirmation of a consensual plan.6 This provides a faster financial fresh start compared to a cramdown plan.

Cramdown Plans

Like traditional Chapter 11 cramdown plans, a Subchapter V cramdown plan may be confirmed over the objection of impaired classes so long as the plan does not “discriminate unfairly” and is “fair and equitable.” However, these standards are interpreted differently in the context of Subchapter V plans.

  • Fundamental Requirements: A Subchapter V plan may be confirmed through the cramdown process once the requirements for a traditional Chapter 11 plan are satisfied, except for 11 U.S.C. §§ 1129(a)(8) (unanimous class consent),7 (10) (approval by at least one impaired class),8 and (15) (absolute priority rule).9
  • No Unfair Discrimination: As in traditional Chapter 11 cramdowns, the plan must not discriminate unfairly against any impaired, non-consenting class. This means similarly situated claims should receive comparable treatment, and any differences must have a reasonable basis and be proposed in good faith.10
  • Fair and Equitable Treatment: The “fair and equitable” standard for dissenting classes of impaired claims is significantly altered in Subchapter V:
    • Secured Claims: For dissenting classes of impaired secured claims, the plan must still meet the existing “fair and equitable” requirements for secured claims under traditional Chapter 11 plans.11
    • Unsecured Claims: The Disposable Income Test: For dissenting classes of unsecured claims, 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(2) establishes a unique disposable income test that replaces the absolute priority rule found in traditional Chapter 11. The plan must provide that, as of the effective date:
      • All of the debtor's projected disposable income received within the first three to five years of the plan will be applied to make payments under the plan; or
      • The value of the property distributed under the plan within the first three to five years is not less than the debtor's projected disposable income.
      • “Disposable Income” Defined: “disposable income” for Subchapter V plans means income not reasonably necessary for the maintenance or support of the debtor or their dependents, domestic support obligations payable post-petition, or for the continuation, preservation, or operation of the debtor’s business.12 This definition allows small business debtors to fund their plans with projected profits from their ongoing operations.
  • Feasibility and Remedies: The plan must also demonstrate that the debtor either (1) can make all payments under the plan, or (2) has a reasonable likelihood of doing so and provides appropriate remedies (including potential liquidation of nonexempt assets) if payments are not made.13 This strengthens the feasibility review beyond that of traditional Chapter 11 cases.14
  • No Absolute Priority Rule: A key difference from traditional Chapter 11 is that the absolute priority rule does not apply in Subchapter V cramdown cases. This allows existing equity owners to retain their ownership interests under a cramdown plan, even if unsecured creditors are not paid in full, without needing to contribute new value. This is a significant advantage for small business owners seeking to retain control of their enterprises.
  • Payment of Postpetition Administrative Expenses: Unlike traditional Chapter 11, where postpetition administrative expenses (e.g., professional fees, post-petition goods and services) are typically required to be paid in full and in cash on the plan's effective date, Subchapter V permits these expenses to be paid over the three-to-five-year period of the plan.15 This provides crucial cash flow flexibility for the debtor during reorganization.

Effects of Confirming a Cramdown Plan

While offering greater flexibility, confirming a Subchapter V cramdown plan carries different consequences for the debtor compared to a consensual plan:

  • Expanded Estate Property: If a cramdown plan is confirmed, property of the estate includes not only the debtor's pre-petition property under 11 U.S.C. § 541(a), but also the debtor’s post-petition acquired property and earnings from services performed until the case is closed, dismissed, or converted.16 This provision ensures that after-acquired property contributes to funding the cramdown plan and maintains judicial oversight of the debtor's assets and earnings.
  • Delayed Discharge: The immediate discharge provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d) do not apply. Instead, the debtor in a cramdown plan does not receive a discharge until they complete all payments under the plan, which can take three to five years.17 Even upon discharge, certain debts are not discharged, including any debt where the last payment is due after the plan's payment period and debts specified in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) (e.g., certain taxes, student loans, debts incurred by fraud).
  • Continued Trustee Involvement: The Subchapter V trustee remains in the case throughout the plan's duration to oversee and make payments, adding to the costs borne by the debtor's estate.18

In summary, 11 U.S.C. § 1191 significantly customizes the confirmation process for Subchapter V debtors, offering a more streamlined and debtor-friendly approach, particularly in cramdown scenarios, by relaxing several stringent requirements found in general Chapter 11. However, these benefits are balanced by continued oversight and a delayed discharge in non-consensual cases.

Conclusion

Confirming a bankruptcy plan is a multifaceted process, with each chapter of the Bankruptcy Code presenting unique challenges and requirements. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for debtors, creditors, and legal professionals alike. While the “best interests of creditors” and “feasibility” tests are common threads, the nuanced differences, found in the cramdown provisions, for example, reflect the distinct purposes and policy considerations behind each bankruptcy Chapter. 

While successfully navigating the plan confirmation process can seem overwhelming, Frost Law’s dedicated team of bankruptcy professionals is here to help clients meet these challenges, offering experienced and personalized guidance throughout the entire process. Contact our team today at (410) 497-5947 or schedule a confidential consultation.

Continue to Part 3

Footnotes

  1. To be eligible under Subchapter V, a business must have aggregate noncontingent, liquidated, secured, and unsecured debts totaling no more than $3,424,000 (a threshold adjusted every three years for inflation). Additionally, the business must be engaged in commercial or business activities, with over 50 percent of its total debt arising from these activities. Eligible debtors generally include small business corporations, partnerships, and individuals who operate commercial enterprises, but not those specifically excluded under the Bankruptcy Code, such as single-asset real estate owners and publicly traded companies. See 11 U.S.C. § 1182; 11 U.S.C. § 104; 11 U.S.C. § 101(51D).
  2. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(a).
  3. A claim is considered impaired if the bankruptcy plan alters the legal, equitable, and contractual rights of the claim holder. 11 U.S.C. § 1124(1). This type of claim holder has the right to vote in a Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan.
  4. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8).
  5. 11 U.S.C. § 1183(c).
  6. 11 U.S.C. § 1141(d).
  7. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8) (“With respect to each class of claims or interests—(A) such class has accepted the plan; or (B) such class is not impaired under the plan.”).
  8. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(10) (“If a class of claims is impaired under the plan, at least one class of claims that is impaired under the plan has accepted the plan, determined without including any acceptance of the plan by any insider.”).
  9. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(15) (“In a case in which the debtor is an individual and in which the holder of an allowed unsecured claim objects to the confirmation of the plan—(A) the value, as of the effective date of the plan, of the property to be distributed under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the amount of such claim; or (B) the value of the property to be distributed under the plan is not less than the projected disposable income of the debtor (as defined in section 1325(b)(2)) to be received during the 5-year period beginning on the date that the first payment is due under the plan, or during the period for which the plan provides payments, whichever is longer.”).
  10. See supra note 15; see also In re Ratledge, 31 B.R. 897, 898 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1983) (considering the following when determining the fairness of discrimination under the plan: (1) whether there is a reasonable basis for the discrimination; (2) whether the debtor can confirm a plan without the discrimination; (3) whether the discrimination is proposed in good faith; and (4) the manner in which the discriminated class is treated under the plan).
  11. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(A); 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(1).
  12. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(d).
  13. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(c)(3).
  14. See 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(11).
  15. 11 U.S.C. § 1191(e).
  16. 11 U.S.C. § 1186(a).
  17. 11 U.S.C. § 1192.
  18. 11 U.S.C. § 1194.