Authors
No items found.

On October 3, 2023, GOP lawmakers blasted the moratorium on the employee retention credit (ERC). Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith and Subcommittee on Oversight Chair David Schweikert wrote to Commissioner Werfel, criticizing the IRS’s decision to halt new ERC claims’ processing. Although the lawmakers expressed appreciation for IRS efforts to protect against fraud, they clarified that “predatory practices cannot be the only reason for the years-long backlog of delivering refunds to eligible businesses, many of which have suffered financial harm while in processing limbo.”

The lawmakers continued by shifting blame to the IRS itself for “[fostering] an environment ripe for fraudsters,” specifying the repeated changes to ERC guidance and poor communication with frustrated applicants. Moreover, besides emphasizing that the “the announced moratorium will exacerbate wait times, worsen existing backlog of claims, and prevent taxpayers with legitimate claims from receiving payments,” they outright accused the IRS of claiming a “false victory over a backlog that has not been resolved” in an IRS statement made September 5, 2023.

Have Questions? Call us for Your consultation.

Significantly, the lawmakers demanded answers to a list of 10 hard-hitting questions, no later than October 17, 2023:

  1. What steps will the IRS take to ensure legitimate ERTC claims filed before the moratorium beginning September 14, 2023 are processed in a reasonable amount of time?
  2. How fast will existing ERTC claims be processed under this new moratorium?
  3. What data points led you to implement the recently announced moratorium?
  4. What is the most up-to-date total dollar figure of ERTC refunds that have been processed?
  5. The IRS counts PEO claims as one claim, even though they may represent hundreds or thousands of claims by different small businesses. How many PEO claims are in the ERTC backlog?
  6. When does the IRS expect the current backlog to be eliminated in its entirety?
  7. What steps will be taken to expedite processing times of legitimate ERTC claims filed during the moratorium, which the IRS will begin processing no earlier than January 1, 2024?
  8. What fraud prevention measures will the IRS take during the moratorium to be better equipped to combat fraud when processing new claims begins in 2024?
  9. What legislative proposal is the IRS considering to address ERTC fraud as referenced in your July 25, 2023 remarks, and when do you plan to share this with Congress for consideration?
  10. Is the IRS considering the creation of a "status check" portal for applicants to receive up­to-date information regarding their claim? Why or why not?

While we wait for an IRS response, if you are just learning about ERC or have a pending claim that needs a second look, make sure you have an experienced tax professional involved throughout the process.

Footnotes

go to All news articles

Lawmakers Criticize ERC Moratorium and Demand Answers from IRS

Published on
October 5, 2023
Lawmakers Criticize ERC Moratorium and Demand Answers from IRS
Author
No items found.
download pdf
By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

On October 3, 2023, GOP lawmakers blasted the moratorium on the employee retention credit (ERC). Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith and Subcommittee on Oversight Chair David Schweikert wrote to Commissioner Werfel, criticizing the IRS’s decision to halt new ERC claims’ processing. Although the lawmakers expressed appreciation for IRS efforts to protect against fraud, they clarified that “predatory practices cannot be the only reason for the years-long backlog of delivering refunds to eligible businesses, many of which have suffered financial harm while in processing limbo.”

The lawmakers continued by shifting blame to the IRS itself for “[fostering] an environment ripe for fraudsters,” specifying the repeated changes to ERC guidance and poor communication with frustrated applicants. Moreover, besides emphasizing that the “the announced moratorium will exacerbate wait times, worsen existing backlog of claims, and prevent taxpayers with legitimate claims from receiving payments,” they outright accused the IRS of claiming a “false victory over a backlog that has not been resolved” in an IRS statement made September 5, 2023.

Have Questions? Call Our Team Today.

Significantly, the lawmakers demanded answers to a list of 10 hard-hitting questions, no later than October 17, 2023:

  1. What steps will the IRS take to ensure legitimate ERTC claims filed before the moratorium beginning September 14, 2023 are processed in a reasonable amount of time?
  2. How fast will existing ERTC claims be processed under this new moratorium?
  3. What data points led you to implement the recently announced moratorium?
  4. What is the most up-to-date total dollar figure of ERTC refunds that have been processed?
  5. The IRS counts PEO claims as one claim, even though they may represent hundreds or thousands of claims by different small businesses. How many PEO claims are in the ERTC backlog?
  6. When does the IRS expect the current backlog to be eliminated in its entirety?
  7. What steps will be taken to expedite processing times of legitimate ERTC claims filed during the moratorium, which the IRS will begin processing no earlier than January 1, 2024?
  8. What fraud prevention measures will the IRS take during the moratorium to be better equipped to combat fraud when processing new claims begins in 2024?
  9. What legislative proposal is the IRS considering to address ERTC fraud as referenced in your July 25, 2023 remarks, and when do you plan to share this with Congress for consideration?
  10. Is the IRS considering the creation of a "status check" portal for applicants to receive up­to-date information regarding their claim? Why or why not?

While we wait for an IRS response, if you are just learning about ERC or have a pending claim that needs a second look, make sure you have an experienced tax professional involved throughout the process.

Footnotes